wenrob
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
What do you mean?There have been conflicting reports from law enforcement.
What do you mean?There have been conflicting reports from law enforcement.
What do I mean? Just what I said, I've read conflicting reports today.What do you mean?
Ah, I'm beginning to see what you mean...
There have been at least two direct quotes here saying she has no involvement.
It’s an ongoing investigation not even 48 hours old. They’re updating what they know as they go.What do I mean? Just what I said, I've read conflicting reports today.
Here's just one.
From US News & World Report:
"Investigators want to interview Paddock's girlfriend, who was out of the country at the time of the shooting.
On Tuesday, they called Marilou Danley "a person of interest" and said the FBI was bringing her back to the U.S. on Wednesday for questioning. On Tuesday, the 62-year-old was in the Philippines."
https://www.usnews.com/news/enterta...-happening-motive-unknown-in-las-vegas-attack
Exactly.It’s an ongoing investigation not even 48 hours old. They’re updating what they know as they go.
This is very true. I, personally, don't see any reason to suspect her of any involvement. But, law enforcement officials would be negligent if they didn't interview her, just as they would be negligent if they didn't interview the shooter's mother and brother and business partners and anyone else he might be close to. They need to establish for certain that he was the "lone wolf" he appears to have been. That's just doing their job.
She, on the other hand, has every reason not to want to set foot in the US. She's a target, and there are a lot of people who would like to pin this on her for a lot of different reasons. So, if they want to talk to her in person, they're just going to have to fly out to wherever she is. Otherwise, they'll have to settle for phone or Skype interviews.
So don't even try. Might as well not even have laws. They will just break them.
I believe Peggy was quoted as saying she hadn't seen him in years.
Why would they "must have some perspective"?
I've been divorced from a man for over 20 years. Had no contact from him what so ever with his family in that time either. No kids together.
If he committed a crime now I would have no insight for them. No idea of his mental or physical state, his possessions, his income level, his address, his romantic interests, his current religious or political views. People often change from when they are in their 20s.
I don't think the gun fetish is in our nature.
My mom and dad have both been married three times apiece. I can guarantee you neither has any insight about what the other is like some 47+ years after they divorced. Their second spouses would have even less of a clue as they don’t share any children or grandchildren.
The Sheriff is pretty pissed about that pic. If I had to guess someone’s career is going to end over that.
Domo, I think you are out of line for these boards. I understand your passion but take it elsewhere!
Let it never be said I don't take tips. I'll tone it down
I agree he has the right. However, as I understand the DISBoard policy, I don't think this is the place.
I completely respect all opinions for sure but what does pitting country against country and all the talk of "my country does better than yours" actually help in this thread? Now I totally get having one's own thread if you wish on gun control it just feels like...
No one of course has to listen to anyone just putting out my opinion here.
Why did he send $100,000 to the Philippines recently? Was he setting his girlfriend up for the future without him or was it used for something else. Very curious.
MJ
I respect that. However I could quote multiple posts that are what I'm talking about but honestly it's not worth it. It would only serve to continue the whole gun control talk that is not one for the Boards.I don’t get the feeling that anyone is piting one country against another, just saying if x doesn’t have this problem (and that could be any problem, why does NZ have such a horrific child abuse problem?) than why not, what are they doing differently than we are, and could that work for us over here.
You are not alone in being curious. No one knows why the money was sent, but what is clear is that a string of coincidences are aligning in a way that is making the "high limit hostess" look more and more suspicious. Specifically:Why did he send $100,000 to the Philippines recently? Was he setting his girlfriend up for the future without him or was it used for something else. Very curious.
MJ
I haven’t seen them and I don’t want to but if these are in fact evidence photos from the scene I don’t see how they wouldn’t be able to eventually figure out who put them out there. I’m not sure how an obscure website would make this person or people untouchable in that regard. Never said anything about imprisonment so I don’t even know how to respond to that.Yes and no. Yes, investigators shouldn't expect a prior spouse to have intimate details on what their ex is like today. But no, that does not mean the prior spouse can't help the investigator to understand what makes the ex tick. No matter how much time has passed since they were together.
How so? You would be amazed at what insights an interview by a trained forensic psychologist can dredge up. And what many here appear to not understand is that there's more to profiling someone than just the picture painted by their present or recent circumstances. Or put another way, you build a fuller picture based on a complete history including the present and past.
If someone's career is going to end over that one, the Sheriff must be planning to imprison someone over the other ones out there that include not only the weaponry in the hotel suite but also the body of the psychopath. FYI, all these the pics were on an obscure Ukrainian site. To quote a famous line from a Ukrainian character in the first "Taken" film,"good luck"....to anyone trying trace how that obscure site got them.
But I assume you weren't married to a psycopathic mass murderer? Perhaps this person had some behaviors that were notable even many years ago that would be insightful to the investigation.Why would they "must have some perspective"?
I've been divorced from a man for over 20 years. Had no contact from him what so ever with his family in that time either. No kids together.
If he committed a crime now I would have no insight for them. No idea of his mental or physical state, his possessions, his income level, his address, his romantic interests, his current religious or political views. People often change from when they are in their 20s.
It appears as if the girlfriend is already back on US soil, arriving in Los Angeles last night.
http://www.wlwt.com/article/las-veg...rns-to-us-for-questioning-1507105176/12777346
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...friend-marilou-danley/?utm_term=.c080ffcc442d