Ah, I'm beginning to see what you mean...This is very true. I, personally, don't see any reason to suspect her of any involvement. But, law enforcement officials would be negligent if they didn't interview her, just as they would be negligent if they didn't interview the shooter's mother and brother and business partners and anyone else he might be close to. They need to establish for certain that he was the "lone wolf" he appears to have been. That's just doing their job.
She, on the other hand, has every reason not to want to set foot in the US. She's a target, and there are a lot of people who would like to pin this on her for a lot of different reasons. So, if they want to talk to her in person, they're just going to have to fly out to wherever she is. Otherwise, they'll have to settle for phone or Skype interviews.
There have been at least two direct quotes here saying she has no involvement.Many others aren't jumping to conclusions about her involvement.
I don't see it that way, and I don't think anyone was trying to do that.
I think it's wise to analyze what other countries who have low gun deaths have done to accomplish this, because something must be done. This is not acceptable, or normal. It has gone horribly horribly wrong and we can't...we shouldn't let it keep happening.
I think that hose unfortunate events are here to stay, regardless if involving terrorist or radicals, large or small scale.
Looking at this guy, there's no way you could prevent this from happening. If you take away the guns, they'll use a truck. You take the truck away, they'll grab a knife. As someone once said, if there's a will, there will be a way.
As I mentioned before, the World is fine, it's the people that are broken. And you can't prevent it all and foresee it coming.
Attention!!!
I know this is an incomprehensible and emotional event, but our guidelines are still in effect:
* No politics
* No gun control rhetoric (see the "no politics" admonition)
* No debates (they get heated and turn to arguments)
We have no control over gun laws.
Buy them one or two at a time, buy from different stores, shop online...Also, DH & I have handguns, but I can't imagine why anyone would need 43 firearms. Are there no kind of flags that pop up when a person is buying several firearms?
Pro-ject make superb turntables! Then again, LPs do I feel still give out the best sound possible. Digital just feels flat?
Yes, because we were quoting law enforcement.Ah, I'm beginning to see what you mean...
There have been at least two direct quotes here saying she has no involvement.
I haven't watched much of the coverage because I'm sick and tired of tragedies being used as a platform. Although, I caught part of the news conference today. More than once, it was stated....they know more, than what's been revealed. Bravo to LE! Let them do their job....media can go jump. MHOYes, because we were quoting law enforcement.
Crud...here come the conspiracy theories. Had a heated battle on FB show up between two friends, one of whom insists there was a second shooter.
I wonder if he timed his attack for when he knew she'd be away, out of the country?
I guess we'll agree to disagree on the country vs country aspect of the conversation pertaining to this thread. As to the rest of your comment admin already commented about talk regarding gun control. I just provided my opinion on the comments that were going on and as I said obviously no one has to listen, it was just my opinion.I don't see it that way, and I don't think anyone was trying to do that.
I think it's wise to analyze what other countries who have low gun deaths have done to accomplish this, because something must be done. This is not acceptable, or normal. It has gone horribly horribly wrong and we can't...we shouldn't let it keep happening.
Every single person with the right to vote has control over gun laws.
I know it seems like semantics but what he said was that it’s an ongoing investigation and there’s things he can’t or won’t answer because it could compromise the investigation. I didn’t take it as any big revelations have been made. There well may be but I don’t think they’re going to be as big as people want them to be.I haven't watched much of the coverage because I'm sick and tired of tragedies being used as a platform. Although, I caught part of the news conference today. More than once, it was stated....they know more, than what's been revealed. Bravo to LE! Let them do their job....media can go jump. MHO
I don't disagree. I'm just happy they aren't spoon feeding the media.I know it seems like semantics but what he said was that it’s an ongoing investigation and there’s things he can’t or won’t answer because it could compromise the investigation. I didn’t take it as any big revelations have been made. There well may be but I don’t think they’re going to be as big as people want them to be.
On the media and persistent internet misinformation I’m with you 100%. Other than the morning after while they were live I skip the news and wait for the press conferences. The information there is direct and as accurate as it can be as they gather it.
There have been conflicting reports from law enforcement.Yes, because we were quoting law enforcement.
My mom and dad have both been married three times apiece. I can guarantee you neither has any insight about what the other is like some 47+ years after they divorced. Their second spouses would have even less of a clue as they don’t share any children or grandchildren.Re: the girlfriend of on-off interest: I am wondering if investigators are also looking to interview one or both of the two prior wives. The first was Sharon Brunoehler of Dallas, TX, with that marriage occurring sometime in the 1970s. They divorced and he then married Peggy Paddock of Cerritos,CA. That marriage also ended in divorce.
They both must have some perspective on what possibly led him to want to end his life in such horrific infamy.
Recent photo of Peggy Paddock
And here is a photo taken of some his weapons as they were found by the SWAT team when they entered his hotel suite. Some are clearly semi-automatics that had been modified into full auto capability. Note the roller suitcase to the right with its back side on the floor, which appears to have been filled with pre-loaded ammunition cartridges.
Re: the girlfriend of on-off interest: I am wondering if investigators are also looking to interview one or both of the two prior wives. The first was Sharon Brunoehler of Dallas, TX, with that marriage occurring sometime in the 1970s. They divorced and he then married Peggy Paddock of Cerritos,CA. That marriage also ended in divorce.
They both must have some perspective on what possibly led him to want to end his life in such horrific infamy.
I believe Peggy was quoted as saying she hadn't seen him in years.Re: the girlfriend of on-off interest: I am wondering if investigators are also looking to interview one or both of the two prior wives. The first was Sharon Brunoehler of Dallas, TX, with that marriage occurring sometime in the 1970s. They divorced and he then married Peggy Paddock of Cerritos,CA. That marriage also ended in divorce.
They both must have some perspective on what possibly led him to want to end his life in such horrific infamy.
Recent photo of Peggy Paddock
And here is a photo taken of some his weapons as they were found by the SWAT team when they entered his hotel suite. Some are clearly semi-automatics that had been modified into full auto capability. Note the roller suitcase to the right with its back side on the floor, which appears to have been filled with pre-loaded ammunition cartridges.