NHdisneylover
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
whici is why, in my example the adult child covered those things for the mom---to make them as close as youcould without being the same property.I think it really depends on how much mom paid for the addition. If mom kept her home, she would've been paying taxes and maintenance on it. How much money does mom have left? Those over 55 places that provide food, laundry, housekeeping, activities are expensive, and it's not clear what type of senior housing the OP is talking about. The OP did indicate that she would be helping her mom out financially.
IF an adult child had, without being asked and without every askng for any payment, and while stating (even now) that they did not want to be paid for those things, had paid for maintenence and taxes for their parent for 20 years---would it then be acceptable for the adult child to claim all profit from teh sale of the parent's home 20 years later? (while the parent was still alive). If not, tehn also not in this case. Someohw people are thinking that the mother's home being an addition instead of on a seperate lot reduces her claim to the money from the sale of her property that she paid for in full. I don't see why that is.