More Eisner news!!

manning

Just for that I have requested it
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
From Los Angeles Times business (taken off their web site)

Take note of two names. Roy Disney and Stanley P. Gold.
Oh, to be the fly on the ceiling.



Eisner Under More Fire as Stock Sinks
Media: Key Disney board members are putting heat on the CEO to act more aggressively. Shares are at their lowest since November 1994.




By JAMES BATES and CLAUDIA ELLER, TIMES STAFF WRITERS


Questions about Michael Eisner's performance as Walt Disney Co.'s chief executive grew sharper Wednesday as the media giant's stock fell to an eight-year low in the wake of last week's dismal earnings forecast and amid shakiness in the company's credit ratings.

What makes the latest round of Disney discontent different from numerous stretches over the last five years when Eisner has felt heat at the company is that key directors are increasingly impatient with its lagging financial performance and stock price.

According to sources close to the board, relations have become especially strained between Eisner and two of Disney's most powerful board members, Roy E. Disney and Stanley P. Gold, whose Shamrock Holdings investment arm has been hurt as the stock price has tumbled.

Although neither Roy Disney nor Gold would comment Wednesday, sources say the two are pressuring Eisner to lift the company's plunging stock price, deal more aggressively with such issues as turning around key divisions such as the ABC television network and even to clarify his succession plans. Tensions have risen in recent weeks, including some pointed exchanges between Eisner and Gold, sources said.

"The board is getting to the point where it is less likely they are going to be as passive as they have been historically," said Jeffrey Logsdon, an analyst with investment banking firm Gerard Klauer Mattison who has covered Disney for years.

But Disney director Ray Watson said the board as a whole supports Eisner, who has headed the company for the last 18 years.

"We have no interest in going out and bringing an unknown into this company and this difficult industry when we believe we already have the best CEO in the business. All companies are under a lot of pressure right now. His pressure is of his own volition, and the board is supporting him," Watson said.

Another Disney director, who requested anonymity, said although Eisner is clearly under pressure, as many CEOs are these days with stock prices tumbling, "there's no coup going on. The board is taking a collegial approach to helping create future shareholder value."

Eisner was unavailable Wednesday for comment. Other Disney executives declined to comment.

Disney's stock fell 48 cents, or 3.3%, to $13.90 on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday, its lowest close since November 1994. Last week, Disney announced another quarter of soft earnings, further warning that the firm's theme park business had eroded. Two credit-rating firms, Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service, subsequently said they might downgrade Disney's debt.

Tensions at Disney also come in the wake of recent shake-ups at three rival media companies: AOL Time Warner Inc. Chief Executive Gerald Levin and Chief Operating Officer Robert W. Pittman resigned under pressure; Vivendi Universal fired CEO Jean-Marie Messier; and Bertelsmann ousted Thomas Middelhoff. It also comes as directors throughout corporate America are being forced to do a better job of scrutinizing company operations.

"I think the board, given what's going on with corporate governance, cannot ignore the need to make immediate improvements," Logsdon said.

In an interview after Disney's earnings were released last week, Eisner and Chief Financial Officer Thomas Staggs defended the company's performance, saying its balance sheet remains strong. They expressed confidence that the company's theme parks and ABC network would recover when the economy stabilizes.

Eisner also disclosed moves aimed at defusing long-standing criticisms that Disney's board is too passive, saying he plans to reduce its size and strengthen the role of independent directors.

"Do I feel specific pressure?" Eisner said in that interview. "No, we feel an obligation to do it."

As poorly as Disney has been performing, the company can point to the stocks of such competitors as AOL Time Warner and Vivendi, both of which have performed even worse. Some analysts believe this has helped deflect heat from Eisner. And, they add, some of Disney's problems are not Eisner's doing but result from the soft economy that has hurt the advertising marketing and tourism.

"It's under-performing, and some of it's the fault of the company," said analyst Tom Wolzien, with Sanford C. Bernstein. "The biggest problem is the combination of the decline of advertising and ratings at ABC. Theme parks are having a tough time--that's not of the company's making. But you put that together with problems at ABC, and people who are supporters of the stock have shifted downward."

Although no single Disney shareholder has enough stock to single-handedly force a change at the company, the growing rift with Roy Disney and Gold is important. Roy Disney is the single largest individual stockholder with 17.5 million shares, according to the company's proxy statement, and is the nephew of Walt Disney. Gold runs Roy Disney's Shamrock Holdings investment empire.

Historically, they have been among his staunchest supporters.

Gold played a pivotal role in the last coup at Disney in 1984 that resulted in Eisner's being hired to turn the company around. In addition, another of Eisner's longtime supporters, the Bass family of Texas, last year divested its shares.

But other major investors have been showing signs of impatience as well. Said Logsdon: "Many institutional investors are very concerned about the performance of some of Disney's assets."

Eisner's status also has been one of the hottest topics in the last week among financial pundits, some of whom have been calling for Eisner to leave. In the online publication Slate, columnist Daniel Gross published a scathing commentary titled: "The Louse in the Mouse House--Why Disney's Michael Eisner should be fired."

Disney's 16-member board is scheduled to meet next in late September. Sources cautioned that the board is not united on taking any specific action. "The board hasn't coalesced. They aren't in camps," the source said.

And Disney internal sources insist that the board is not badly divided and that directors continue to support Eisner.

But Logsdon said the future relationship between Eisner and the Disney board is uncertain.
 
I think I've finally figured it out:
Eisner is like the one-night stand that won't leave: sure it was fun in the begining & you got what you wanted, but then the morning comes, the make-up is off, he wants to meet your folks, wear your clothes & move in.

Disney should have done the decent thing: paid for cab fare & given the empty promise to "call sometime".
 
I can't find the story, but according to The Laughing Place, Cindy Adams at Page Six in the NY Post was reporting that Jeffrey Katzenberg was a possible replacement for Eisner. I had a friend interview Katz in Germany a few months back and I asked him to discuss the possibility of him moving away from Dreamworks and back to Disney, but Jeffrey didn't discuss it. I mean, Katz is a part owner of Dreamworks. To abandon his own property to become CEO of another... is that possible? Please, GOD. Yes! It's clear that Jeffrey knows what Disney needs and what it SHOULD BE. Maybe we can pull a Steve Jobs and become "interim CEO" for as long as the company needs him to turn around. I mean, here's Jobs, part owner of Pixar, moving away from his own property to save a company he *used* to own but was eventually unceremoniously fired from. I mean, it's not unprecedented.

Enough of this @#*& of hiring people from outside the company who THINK they know what Disney needs. We need someone who understands the Disney ideal. And Katz is the best thing short of thawing out Walt Disney himself.

Raul/Mop
 
But Iger, Pressler, and Staggs were all outsiders once who never really adapted to the "Disney ideal" (because that was bred out of the upper echelon's culture a long time ago - around the time Frank Wells died and Katz left). (To tell the truth, I don't know what Staggs' and Pressler's pedigree is, but I know that Iger comes from ABC, and I'm sure no one bothered to teach him the "Disney Ideal".)

Katz - while currently an outsider - was bred inside the Disney incubator that existed years ago and is more a Disney insider than any current Disney executive (how's that for irony?). You can tell from his attitude in his actions and his movies that he still has the values that the Walt Disney Company once held close to its heart and made it such a valued consumer entity. Now it's become a cold, heartless corporate conglomorate.

It's like a cancer touching every aspect of Disney management... people hired from outside the company who's only intention is to pad the bottom line. But in doing so, they lose the personal touches that make it Disney, and instead HURT the bottom line. More irony.

Individual stock holders see this, but they don't have the power to do anything about it. It's the institutional stock holders that have to open their eyes and realize that text book attempts to pad the bottom line don't work for a company like Disney. You need people to come back to Disney, to their movies, their stores and their theme parks. And you do that by making it an appealing place to come back to. When the institutional stock holders realize this, they'll get rid of Eisner and replace him with someone who can make this happen. Until they realize this, Eisner is better than anyone else they might hire (who would just continue the status quo of slashing and burning).

Raul/Mop
 
This article appeared in the Los Angeles Daily News



Eisner pressured as Disney fades


By Laura M. Holson
The New York Times


BURBANK -- To hear Michael D. Eisner, the chairman of the Walt Disney Co. tell it, recent talk of the company's sagging share price and discontent among a select group of board members is so much background noise in the marketplace.
"Nothing is taken frivolously," Eisner said in an interview in his office here. "But I don't take it as a No. 1 concern."

Discussions with board members about things like share price and management issues are normal, he said, especially with Roy Disney, the nephew of the company's founder. And as if to prove all was well with Disney despite the share price hitting an eight-year low this week, a staff member appeared with a research report that said Disney's stock would be an exceptional performer in the next 12 months.

"We think we are in a fantastic spot," Eisner said.

Now, if only the rest of the world agreed. Disney shocked Wall Street last week when the company said that fiscal fourth-quarter profit would be lower than expected due to lackluster theme park attendance. Two Wall Street credit rating agencies then issued warnings that the company's long-term debt could be reviewed for a downgrade. The ABC network remains troubled and the company's profitable relationship with Pixar is up for renegotiation next year. Even the good news -- Disney's "Signs" was No. 1 at the box office last weekend -- has failed to muster much excitement.

The question going through many people's minds these days is whether Eisner, who has been chief executive of Disney for 18 years, has the wherewithal to turn the company around. To be sure, some board members as well as investors are unhappy with the stock price decline and have expressed their concern privately to Eisner. Among them are Disney and Stanley Gold, whose Shamrock Holdings is the investment arm for the Disney family. The pair is pressuring Eisner to shore up ABC and settle on a succession plan, said three people close to the board. Neither returned calls seeking comment.

Disney's share price, which traded at a historic high of $43.64 on April 28, 2000, closed on Thursday at $14.50, almost half of its 52-week high. According to one investment banker, a joke going around Wall Street was that the Texas investors Sid and Lee Bass, along with their father, Perry, who sold almost $2 billion worth of Disney stock at $15 a share last year to help pay off margin loans, "now look like geniuses."

Eisner has been taken to task by the news media for poor stock performance for months, even years. But according to two people close to the board, Gold is trying to tap into the discontent of other investors in what might end as a power struggle between Gold -- aided by Disney -- and Eisner over Disney's future direction.

Gold has not addressed his concerns with other board members, these people said. And one person suggested that the reason for the outcry from the Disney family was that family members had leveraged their Disney stock to make other investments and that, having seen the price stock plummet, they might be subject to a margin call and be forced to sell. A person close to the family said they were prepared to cover a margin call if it happened. "We are on the ragged edge," said the person.

Several board members expressed their continued support for Eisner, chalking up Disney's problems to the recession and the downturn in media stocks. "I have confidence in the management," said a board member, the Rev. Leo O'Donovan, in a telephone interview from Maine where he was vacationing. "Beyond that I can't second-guess what other people say."

But observers who have watched the stock flag compared with the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index and the Dow Jones industrial average are not so sanguine. "Management does not give me comfort they will manage through this with any aplomb," said Scott Reamer, a money manager at Union Tree Capital, which invests in media stocks but has no investment in Disney.

Disney, which has been criticized for having a weak board, had announced steps to bolster its board practices, including shrinking the size of its board. "Clearly someone has to start putting down accountability standards for Eisner," said Richard Koppes, an attorney who advises companies on corporate governance. "I think the company is going to get a lot of attention in the coming proxy season." But Eisner said critics had only to consider that Disney had not had the same accounting scandals as other companies. "The most important thing about a board is its character," he said.

Many critics of the company chide the board for letting Eisner stay too long. One story that has been widely circulated at Hollywood parties, and confirmed by a board member who was there, says that Eisner had dinner with a handful of senior executives and board members in early summer, and when someone casually asked him who could succeed him he mentioned two Disney executives, Tom Staggs, the chief financial officer, and Robert Iger, the president.

Eisner declined to comment about who might succeed him. But several names have been the subject of rumors in Hollywood lately, including Viacom's president, Mel Karmazin; Howard Stringer, chief executive of the Sony Corp. of America; and, more recently, Jeffrey Katzenberg, who used to work at Disney and whose tenure ended in a bitter lawsuit. None of the men returned calls seeking comment. According to two board members, the board is not looking to replace Eisner.

Whatever the machinations in the corporate suite, investors seem unsure of the company's immediate future. Large investors "were selling out this week because they do not know where the stock is going," Reamer said.

One concern is that if the theme parks, which are huge cash generators but also have high fixed costs, do not rebound quickly Disney's cash position could be affected and, if the company does have to borrow, it could face higher interest rates. Staggs of Disney said the company managed its long-term debt conservatively, and "there is no short-term liquidity problem."

ABC's prime-time problems are well documented. But Eisner said the company had taken steps to improve the network's performance, including an agreement to repackage the popular cable show, "Monk," which Disney developed, on ABC and a deal for HBO to develop new shows for the network.

Eisner insists that the company's film division has signed a handful of deals with producers and there are more to come. But investors are concerned over Disney's profitable contract with Pixar, the maker of animated films, which ends in 2006. According to a report prepared by a Morgan Stanley analyst, Richard Bilotti, Pixar can begin negotiating a new contract with Disney or another studio after it delivers the film "Finding Nemo" next summer.

One scenario being considered by Pixar, said one person close to the company, is a venture in which Pixar finances and markets its own movies and Disney only distributes them, earning a 10 percent stake of revenues in return. That is a far cry from the 50 percent stake Disney now gets.

Eisner said he had not had conversations with Pixar, but that "we value our relationship." Still, he added, "our facilities are not for rent."
 
Eisner: Disney Set to Turn Around - WSJ

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS - News) Chief Executive Officer Michael Eisner said he has positioned the firm for growth by cutting costs, boosting cash flow and building up assets, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.


Eisner told the Journal in an interview that even as Disney's performance has suffered, the company has been priming itself for the future.

It has steadily extended its brands by adding theme parks in Florida, California, Paris and Tokyo, and creating or buying cable channels including SoapNet, ESPNews and ABC Family, the paper said.

Eisner also told the Journal that Disney doesn't need to spend time or money cleaning up media deals gone wrong such as those consuming the resources of AOL Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:AOL - News) and Vivendi Universal SA (Paris:EAUG.PA - News).

When the economy turns, Eisner predicted Disney could be poised to return to growth. Disney saw massive growth during the first dozen years after Eisner took over in 1984, but has stalled recently.

Earnings have declined each year since 1997 and the company's stock trades at 1994 levels, the paper noted.
 
Disney should have done the decent thing: paid for cab fare & given the empty promise to "call sometime".
This is only an example (of many threads I could have chosen) of this guy’s style!! I LOVE it!!! Course, it helps that I believe him to be a car 3er!! Thanks Jeff in BigD and keep on posting!!!!
It's like a cancer touching every aspect of Disney management
EXACTLY!! The very analogy I’ve been using for the past two years!!!

And from the article:
Disney saw massive growth during the first dozen years after Eisner took over in 1984, but has stalled recently.
Massive growth by raping the property and the film vault, not to mention capitalizing on the talent of those he has since fired!!!
gcurling already posted this yesterday.
Yeah! I suppose no one was interested yesterday! (or they ignore my main man Greg for some reason or another!! But I refuse to believe that!! :))

I guess this is one of those rare instances where I’m just forced to agree with our resident Scoop and thank you for re-posting!! That’s what we always say!! The more threads the merrier!! Right? ;)
 
From Yahoo Finance (via Laughing Place): Italics are my own.

Friday August 9, 9:55 PM
Disney poised for rebound: Eisner

Despite its dismal record, Walt Disney Co. has been doing all the right things and is poised for a rebound, said its chairman Michael Eisner.

In an interview published in The Wall Street Journal, Eisner said the company has extended its brands by building up key assets, adding theme parks in Florida, California, Paris and Tokyo and creating or buying cable channels, has no mess to clean up from media deals gone awry and is scandal-free.

When the economy turns, Eisner said, Disney will be poised to return to its previous growth pattern, and may even have a "gusher" on its hands.

Eisner's predictions fly in the face of its own latest figures: net profit for its fiscal third quarter slid 31 percent from a year earlier to 364 million dollars amid lower theme part attendance and slumping ad revenues. And Moody's Investors Service has placed the 'A3' long-term rating of Walt Disney Co on review for possible downgrade.

"I'm amused that people don't get it," Eisner said. "Everyone's shouting that the sky is falling. The sky is not falling."

Disney's problem with its ABC Network, Eisner said, is "the easiest" to fix. "That doesn't mean it will happen. But fixing a prime-time schedule is about the right idea, the right director, the right producer. We're in control of that."

He said he hopes Disney will have taken a good first step in fixing the problem with its fall schedule for the ABC network.

Turning around the disappointing attendance at Disney's theme parks, Eisner said, is largely beyond the ability of management to fix and have to be waited out.

The only approach to the future, he said, "that still makes sense is, do your job. Make each one of your great brands work well. Run the balance sheet well. Run the company well."

As far as his own job security, Eisner, 60, dismissed rumors that his contract might end before it expires in 2006, adding that he has been in close contact with each board member and has heard no suggestion that they are looking to replace him.
_______________________________________



disappointing attendance at Disney's theme parks, Eisner said, is largely beyond the ability of management to fix

Eisner is absolutely right about that one, just not for the reasons he thinks. Current management doesn't seem to have a clue when it comes to the theme parks. Of course, we are often amused that HE doesn't get it!
 
Originally posted by DVC-Landbaron
This is only an example (of many threads I could have chosen) of this guy’s style!! I LOVE it!!! Course, it helps that I believe him to be a car 3er!! Thanks Jeff in BigD and keep on posting!!!!EXACTLY!! The very analogy I’ve been using for the past two years!!!
Thanks, you should see me when I really get going & I'm always brewing up fresh batches of "pithy".

I assume being in Car 3 means you think that the current management is driving the company bus straight towards a cliff & they're sucky drivers to boot? If that's the case, then yup, I'm in Car 3 & I'm calling shotgun.

I do feel a little bad though - I've already gone through 16 Paul Pressler voo-doo dolls. Does that make me a bad person? I do think it's a tad weird that I picked them ugly lil pin cushions up down in New Orleans...Square. Not because they're selling them, but because the CMs & WDI haven't bought them all. ;)

. o O (Hmm, maybe there's some money to be made from that?)
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top