Why complain about it? Esp since you don't even own there?
because IMO it is very likely that in the next 38 years when I book a vacation for my family at 200 days, it will be where i will HAVE to stay.
Which have you ever stayed there?
no, took a tour back in 04. Keep in mind, SSR is nice, it really is. Heck it's brand new, everything is nice. But, at this point in time not on par with the other resorts. look at the pool size vs # of rooms, look at the places to eat vs the # of rooms. But it's the location above everything. We go to WDW, for WDW. If we want a pool/shopping vacation why fly/drive 1000 miles?
If DVC was willing to make SSR a DVC2 resort with a new 50 years, then IMO they should have just put it into a pool of other resorts with 50 years, and left the current DVC resorts in it's own pool of resorts.
Why would you build a resort that is the largest, and put that resort in a location that is the least desirable to the largest number of people? we all know the answer........ The same person who pulled the trigger on SSR, also just turned down the pools 4 degrees. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$