gottalovepluto
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
Plain old common sense. You don’t let a tenant do what has been done to that building without lots of financial assurances.Pretty absurd statement not knowing the opposing costs and terms.
Many outlets reported he/inner circle took all budgeting power down to small details they should have had nothing to do with. It was an idiotic decision. While I think the odds this lease was constructed without an operational date, it is not impossible due to that idiotic decision as the desire to pay less Tenant Improvement money/get a higher rent could have led to an operational date being left out…Do you have any sources for this information? Seems entirely unlikely that Chapek would be involved in such a small transaction.