Or Disney will fire them all?I think it is in the contract they can not Strike or stage a Sick call out day .
Or no longer recognize the union for collective bargaining.Or Disney will fire them all?
Either way, it would destroy their labor base which was already decimated. Disney is basically playing chicken with the entire future of the company. Even a single day strike would crush their stock price and wall street confidence.Or no longer recognize the union for collective bargaining.
But since the contract has technically expired that provision is not binding.I think it is in the contract they can not Strike or stage a Sick call out day .
You can think that all you want, but investors won't agree. Guess who Disney leadership is going listen to?
Without the investors there would be no company.Employers should always put their employees above investors.
Without the investors there would be no company.
Finding that middle ground of keeping "unskilled" employees and investors happy is possible, there are "ethical" capitalistic companies that do it really well... Costco is probably one of the best examples.
When you invest in your employees and they feel like you care, they tend to perform better and stay longer.
Yeah, I don't believe that. They will work just like they have been working. And Disney probably doesn't want everyone to stay longer. The longer you stay and higher you get paid for unskilled labor, the more likely they will want to replace you with someone new that can do the same for lower starting pay.
And really, how much better do you need or expect the ice cream bar guy to perform?
Yeah, I don't believe that. They will work just like they have been working. And Disney probably doesn't want everyone to stay longer. The longer you stay and higher you get paid for unskilled labor, the more likely they will want to replace you with someone new that can do the same for lower starting pay.
And really, how much better do you need or expect the ice cream bar guy to perform?
I think a flat tax might be interesting. Consumption too.This is why there is a movement for minimal flat income tax rates or elimination of income tax altogether and implementing consumption taxes. This post is not advocacy, I'm just explaining the policy for some folks who want to abolish the current federal income tax code and substantially overhaul it with a different type of taxation. By doing so would allow families that park money into trusts or off-shore accounts to avoid income taxation can be taxed when they purchase goods and services.
Frankly, I would be shocked if the federal government ever substantially overhauled the tax code and replaced it. It appears that elected officials have to make the same arguments against the other party about taxation loopholes and avoidance that those same elected officials voted for year after year, decade after decade. At least, they get their campaign contributions though, right.
Similarly speaking, fundamentally changing the federal tax code would be like the federal government fundamentally changing the social security system. Anyone suggesting to make substantive structural changes to a completely broken and antiquated system of welfare will be viewed like Lady Tremaine.
You don't have to believe it, but it has been studied and proven. People don't like feeling like they aren't valued. Employees who feel fairly compensated take pride in the work they do and feel loyalty to their company.
So if I paid you $50 an hour to sell ice cream you wouldn't work harder to make sure you keep that job?
Sounds like you are hoping Disney becomes Six Flags with those stances
This is why there is a movement for minimal flat income tax rates or elimination of income tax altogether and implementing consumption taxes. This post is not advocacy, I'm just explaining the policy for some folks who want to abolish the current federal income tax code and substantially overhaul it with a different type of taxation. By doing so would allow families that park money into trusts or off-shore accounts to avoid income taxation can be taxed when they purchase goods and services.
Frankly, I would be shocked if the federal government ever substantially overhauled the tax code and replaced it. It appears that elected officials have to make the same arguments against the other party about taxation loopholes and avoidance that those same elected officials voted for year after year, decade after decade. At least, they get their campaign contributions though, right.
Similarly speaking, fundamentally changing the federal tax code would be like the federal government fundamentally changing the social security system. Anyone suggesting to make substantive structural changes to a completely broken and antiquated system of welfare will be viewed like Lady Tremaine.