I totally agree, but with a slightly different slant. Give, not loan, whatever you are willing to part with, or decline outright but the idea of a "loan" to family is almost always the road to heartache.The biggest mistake I have seen? Lend money to family members. And, of course, it never gets paid back.
I just would never lend a dime. Can't pay your mortgage? Rent a room. Can't make your car payment? Drive a junker. Can't pay your basic bills? Get another job. Get three jobs. Eat rice and beans. Ditch your iphone and get a track phone. I'm not giving you money. Family or not.
My one co-worker just lent $5k to his son and daughter-in-law. They were behind on "a lot of stuff". Oh. They also just got back from Las Vegas. He was so mad they took a trip when they owe him money. This is how family fights occur.
Most of the people I know don’t put a lot into their 401k. Big big mistake
The more you make the more sense it makes to add to it. I can defer enough income to drop a bracket. But if you’re stretched income wise, I can see people only putting in enough to get the match.
The problem with 401k contrbutions is that while you get the tax benefit now, you might need it more later. We will likely be in a higher tax bracket later on in life than we are now. So, for us, 401k isn't the best investment option. Roth is better for us now, as we have an artifically low income (since a full third of our income is tax free allowances) so we can still make Roth contributions. We do have a 401k type plan that we contribute to, but we only put 7% of our income into that every month. The rest goes into the Roths.
That's what happened to me and DH. When we retire again, we will still be in a much higher tax bracket than we were when we first invested in our 401 and 457 so we really lost out on that tax situation.
People don't ask for advice to hear they are wrong, they ask to get confirmation they are right!I really can't fathom seeking the professional opinion of a contractor only to ignore it entirely.
The problem with 401k contrbutions is that while you get the tax benefit now, you might need it more later. We will likely be in a higher tax bracket later on in life than we are now. So, for us, 401k isn't the best investment option. Roth is better for us now, as we have an artifically low income (since a full third of our income is tax free allowances) so we can still make Roth contributions. We do have a 401k type plan that we contribute to, but we only put 7% of our income into that every month. The rest goes into the Roths.
These plans really help out high income investors that can’t invest in Roth IRAs. I’m now deferring enough to move from a 32% bracket to a 24% bracket. And I will most likely withdraw at a 12% bracket. It makes sense. If you don’t see the benefit, then a Roth makes sense and only add to capture the match. Taxable also makes sense to if you plan to retire early.
Lol, I think this may be one time we actually agree on something! This is an issue for lots of small businesses and franchised places. Being able to give all of your employees those things is something I think most small business owners wish they could do, but can't afford. And I think a lot of new business owners waaay underestimate the true costs of opening a business then try to cut costs, like permits or think they can slide something past the inspectors then end up spending more than they would have to do it right to begin with.2) About 20 years ago a co-worker opened a coffee shop with his wife. This was before Starbucks was in the area. They butted heads with the building department over things they didn't want to do, permits etc, so their opening costs were way over budget. They were determined to pay a living wage, offer health insurance, vacation and sick time to employees. They did a brisk business, but they couldn't cover their fixed costs because customers wouldn't pay the prices he would have needed to charge to cover costs.
People don't ask for advice to hear they are wrong, they ask to get confirmation they are right!
I disagree. I agree she had good intentions, but I don't think screwing herself over is "ethical."Again, a bad financial decision for her perhaps but ethically, a very decent thing to do.
I disagree. I agree she had good intentions, but I don't think screwing herself over is "ethical."
Exactly, most people don't share info on their finances with others, even in their own family. So most of this is probably guessing and a chance to feel smarter than others that you perceive to be making poor financial decisions.Honestly I don't get this thread. Most of us do not have 100% complete pictures of others finances and sharing what we perceive from the outside as "mistakes" leaves a bit of a sour taste in my mouth. If this question was asked on a different forum they could easily answer how so and so spends so much money at Disney.
I have enough of my own financial mistakes. I don't need to share what faults others might have.
I couldn't "like" your post without feeling like I was liking how they are treating her. Paying for the expenses and giving them what is left would have been absolutely the fair/ethical/right thing to do. So sad that she tried to do what was right and is paying the price.Yeah when her ex husband died none of his "kids" stepped up to pay for his cremation. His kids were all in their 30s. She felt bad and paid for it out of pocket. So she was out a lot of money. I think she should have paid the expenses that were brought on by him and then given them whatever was left over. It's sad cause now she has cancer and no one is stepping up in her family to help and she has to continue working while in treatment.
Exactly, most people don't share info on their finances with others, even in their own family. So most of this is probably guessing and a chance to feel smarter than others that you perceive to be making poor financial decisions.
Start a hypothetical "My Ex-Step Mother Stole My Inheritance" thread and let's see what the wisdom of the crowd says. IRL though, what does your friend say about her own situation? Is she mad at herself for her decisions?I disagree. I agree she had good intentions, but I don't think screwing herself over is "ethical."