The real insidious part is that there isn't much, if any, real outright fiction in the report, it's just that perfectly normal practices are disingenuously presented as horribly improper. Like suggesting that failing to build schools within the district, which has no residents to speak of, is depriving the community of resources despite the fact that Disney pays disproportionately high property taxes that substantially fund schools in surrounding communities where they actually belong. Or that they got out of paying impact fees even though they were paying more in other ways. Even if you fully accept the text of the report as true, the only whiff of an actual improper act (as opposed to vague ramblings about the potential for improper acts if the District did a bunch of things that there's no actual evidence that they did) is that the district might have failed to tell employees that some of the ancillary benefits they were receiving were taxable gifts.