Aren't the snack chaning for the new dining plan as well???
As well as the tip not being included is the tax included in the new plan too???
You need to do the math. I used the menu's on Allearsnet and added it up. Ignoring the tip in both cases and even with the appetizer no longer included, it is still a better deal for us to use the dining plan. I figured we would save about $300 doing it that way.....which really surprised me. I didn't think we would do the dining plan again until I added everything up.
But don't forget to take your grand totals and add 10-18% for the tips. If you're saving that much before tip then you must be eating at some of the more expensive places, which means that $300 savings is likely to be taken by the tips. My number crunching showed me saving a small amount (of course assuming that we'd actually stick to the plan and eat the items we chose today)...but when I added in 15% for a tip all savings were gone and it was now going to cost me. I assumed 15% tip because I'd tip lower for poor service (which has been reported quite often on these boards), but I'd also tip more for johnny-on-the-spot service as it makes for a more pleasant experience for my family. If the reports that service should improve everywhere because they're having to work for it again are correct, then I'll possibly have budgeted too little for tips!
How many days are you staying?
I see your point. In my example above, if the $290 was just the cost of food and tax, if we weren't on the plan we would be spending $340 (the $290 plus 18%) so the tip should be left out of the equation. The plan itself would cost $230, for which we'd have $290 worth of food and tax covered. With the snack there is a decent savings. That is assuming we would have ordered the same $ amount worth of food if we weren't on the plan, which we might not have. Skip one appetizer or dessert, pass on the surf and turf.....bye, bye "savings". Even on a day when we'd do cheaper meals there would still be some savings, or a breakeven. So the deluxe plan could be a good deal, or at least let you eat a little better for the same money. The regular plan isn't, not without the appetizer.The tip amount doesn't matter in your savings if you would still eat there whether you got DDP or not - that seems to be what the poster was trying to figure out. If the cost of the meals themselves is more that the cost of the DDP for the day, and you would eat there anyway (not everyone only eats TS b/c of the DDP) the tip amount is moot.
Service knows they are getting 18% so dont have to go out of there way. Yes, always exceptions.
It does seems it created jobs for specialty chefs especially the appetizer and desserts guys/ gals.
Too many people are focusing on what they saved in the past. The old plan is gone and you can't base your new savings on those numbers. Ask yourself if you would eat TS anyway - if you would, either way you are paying the tip. Is what you would order, along with a CS more than $40? If so, buy the DDP. If not, don't buy the DDP. Same works for DxDDP. We eat 3 meals a day plan or no plan and will continue doing this in the future. A 1TS dinner would be at least $30-35, TS lunch $25-30, and character breakfast $20. That's more than $70 so DxDDP makes sense. Not counting snacks its about a $10 savings per person. Why wouldn't I like to save $10? I have to tip whether I buy a plan or not so that doesn't even go into my calculation.
Haven't crunched the numbers yet -- but my initial reaction would be "NO."
Half the benefit of the DDP is the convenience factor. That's gone.
The Deluxe plan is way too much food. So, even if that numbers worked out for our benefit -- it would really be wasting food and money.
Maybe we can finally go back to staying at our Orlando timeshare (since we haven't stayed there for many years).
Many people feel this way. I am not discounting the fact it wouldn't work for you, but the new plan works better for my family. My opinion is that for every family that will move off of site due to the changes, they will get a family that stopped going but was willing to spend more back again.
I know that we will now go at least twice in 2008 where before we had skipped 2007 due to the dining plan (and the people that abused it).
I'm not so sure I'd count on that if I were Disney. How many people are really going to evaluate the changes and say that in 2007 the plan wasn't cost effective and didn't work for me, but now that it costs more and they are giving me less I'll give it a shot? Me thinks you will be in the minority .
Do you think that disney would rather appeal to people like us (who canceled a Premium package due to the abusers and not wanting to deal with them) and the money that accompanies it or the people that milk every dime and spend little money on souvenirs? I am thinking their overall bottom line dropped by appealing to the uber budget minded because appealing to them made people willing to pay for more avoid the parks due to the "6 flags" atomosphere that their dining plan brought in.
Do you think that disney would rather appeal to people like us (who canceled a Premium package due to the abusers and not wanting to deal with them) and the money that accompanies it or the people that milk every dime and spend little money on souvenirs? I am thinking their overall bottom line dropped by appealing to the uber budget minded because appealing to them made people willing to pay for more avoid the parks due to the "6 flags" atomosphere that their dining plan brought in.