OSUZorba
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
I have only used Uber twice in my life, so don't really care, but it annoys me that society can judge a company like Uber based on incorrect assumptions. They are not a taxi company, and they do not have employees. Period. They are a ride sharing company. Some drivers have decided to do this full time to get around taxi company restrictions. That isn't on Uber. Your problem is with them, not Uber. The Uber service fills a need in communities all across America - a real need that is not being filled by taxi companies. It also monetizes ride sharing (car pooling), thus making it something of a reality in America for the first time in our history, whic is very good for the environment.
If you have a problem with possible liability issues, I get it. If you have problems getting into a car with someone that you do not know and who has not been fully vetted, I get that, too. Almost all of other stuff is garbage, mostly put out there by people who have lost business to Uber drivers.
Don't just trust what you read on the internet, including my posts. Seek out opposing view points. There is as much on the web refuting the attacks on Uber as there is attacking the company. The attacks against Uber have become a political football, so the truth has been obfuscated. You have to dig to find it.
True ride sharing is "I'm driving here, who wants a ride," not being summoned across town by a stranger to pick them up and drop them off at places you wouldn't have gone to otherwise. That is a taxi or car service.
In a city like OKC that has very little traditional taxi service, because you could never pay for the overhead, there is a place for something like Uber. In NYC and Disney, it is just another taxi service, getting around the laws, and significantly hurts people who follow the laws.