luvdisneyland
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
1. If you are going to be aggressive and rude, at least be correct and know what you are talking about ( instead of telling someone else "it just doesn't seem like they know what they are talking about"). Kickbacks are completely ILLEGAL, so I suggest you educate yourself before coming at someone and spreading false info. If you find any agecenies that are- report them.There's so much wrong here, it seems like you just don't know what you are talking about.
Fidelity doesn't "underprice" contracts. They are well above ROFR most of the time, and they've even been above board sponsor, who I guess you think is "overpricing" contracts? Fidelity doesn't play a lot of the offer, counteroffer, time waste games. They list at what I consider market, and they have the broker fee, which I think can be a good thing in these transactions, especially as contracts get cheaper.
It's not "illegal" to give "kick backs." What are you talking about? Of course all of these companies work with each other or don't because of their financial agreements.
And "get what you pay for" huh? Title companies are awfully close to each other on pricing, I think it was maybe 50$ on my last contract. Points are points. I've paid for points at three brokers, and I'd do it privately, like on Facebook, as long as I had a good title company. Paying more for points does not make you better than others. Or, if you think it does, just buy direct.
As a seller, you have a lot of options, that's not a bad thing.
https://www.nar.realtor/ae/manage-your-association/association-policy/following-respa-rules
2. ROFR doesn't equate market price
3. When I said "you get what you pay for" I wasn't referring to the title company, I was referring to the brokerage you choose. It's almost like you are affilitated with Fidelity.
4. I never said paying more for points makes me better than others, that is just an agrumentitive, childish comment, huh?
5. The only thing here I can agree on is your statement about sellers having lots of options being a good thing- same goes for buyers.
Lastly, to put this ridiclous post to bed ( at least for me). I'd like to remind everyone harping on Fidelity's market share, that the context in which I mentioned Fidelity was in repsonse to a poster saying they base market value on Fiedlitys sales- it is not an accurate way of gauging the market- that's all. So you can stop trying to twist and change what I was saying- along with the other one who misquoted me and glossed right over it.