Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
The freedom argument gets in the way because then that's all everyone focuses on and then we get the speed limit and seat belt discussion.I don't see how this somehow limits our freedoms if airlines decide to stop serving alcohol. It is a safety issue when unruly passengers get into a brawl at 30,000 feet in the air. No one can predict ahead of time who will behave that way. Airlines run a private business and people are welcome to travel with some other airline or drive by car if they don't like the rules of that airline. I guess those same people will argue we shouldn't have speed limits on freeways because that somehow inhibits their freedom.
In this case it's misattributing things. Of course alcohol can create situations that get out of control, where people lose inhibitions and their tongues get loose. However, that isn't the case for all passengers who end up being classified as unruly. If they think removing alcohol from the equation will mean people won't still get to the level of being jerks, won't still have to be escorted off the plane or have fights with other people (be it passengers or FAs or gate agents) or insults thrown or this passenger kicking that passenger's chair or encroaching on their space and causing issues, etc well I highly doubt it.
We rarely get a drink on SWA (always with a drink coupon) so would we personally be offended? No but I don't see it actually solving the issue long-term. If you consider that alcohol wasn't on the flight when this fight occurred in particular with SWA, and that the fight was about masks we know fights have broken out just over that. People will find a way if they really want to, being asked to move, luggage won't fit, tray table up, etc