This is an interesting discussion! Before I start my post, I just want to make it clear that I'm about to go off on an academic musing. I always try my hardest (as I'm sure everyone here does) not to use language that would offend or upset anyone, and I don't believe for one second that a disability makes someone inferior to anyone else, in the same way that race, gender, sexuality or anything else doesn't. So, that said, off I go!
It's interesting how the meanings of words change. For instance, the term 'spastic' was originally another name for CP, and is still used as a medical definition for certain forms of CP (at least it is here, I have no idea about American medical terminology). The charity now known as SCOPE, used to be called the Spastic Society, and was in now way intended to demean those with CP. However now, it is used by some as an offensive term for anyone with a disability, or as an insult to anyone (in the same way as the r word is sometimes used). Also, the meanings of words are still changing, and certain words are becoming 'less acceptable'. As Leise said, the term 'handicapped' is now considered shaky ground over here.
Recently, SCOPE (sorry, I know that's 2 references to that one charity in this post, but I know a fair bit about it, as my mother works for them) published a leaflet outlining politically correct and incorrect language. We are no longer allowed to say 'disabled toilet' but must say 'accessible toilet'. OK, so I can see from a semantic point of view that, as the toilet isn't disabled, the original one is a little odd, but does this mean that other toilets are not accessible to anyone? Are they bricked in?
One of their 'politically correct' terms, actually offended me, though. They claim that you should no longer describe someone as 'able-bodied' but as 'non-disabled'. Now, in my mind, these are not the same thing at all! I have a friend with dyslexia, dyspraxia, OCD, ADHD, SSS, and probably a couple of other things that I have forgotten - he is certainly able-bodied (a little overly able, sometimes
) but is very far from being 'non-disabled'. The reason I find this offensive, is that it is implying that the only disabilities are mobility disabilities.
So I guess that brings me to the point that different people find different things offensive. This isn't an 'oh well, we shouldn't bother' type of statement, just that there are no easy answers (when are there ever?).
It's interesting the power that society gives to different words. The more something is used as a derogatory term, the more offensive people find it. I guess we could all adopt the 'sticks and stones' attitude, but you guys know as well as I do that words can hurt a lot more than bruises
. Along the whole 'power of words' lines, Colours Wheelchairs produced a wheelchair called 'Spazz'. They did this to challenge perceptions of words, and the power we give them (also it gave them a bit of a 'bad boy' image
). It is now one of their best selling products.
Among my friends, I will happily respond to the term 'crip'. It's a running joke we have, and I know that they don't mean it to be nasty. In fact, when I am meeting people, I will sometimes say "but I'll also respond to oi crip" as a way to break the ice, and stop them feeling uncomfortable about the wheelchair. Now, I would
never call anyone else 'crip' unless I was certain that they were in on the joke (I have a couple of friends with disabilities, who are perfectly happy to join in the banter), because I know that it can be a very hurtful term.
I guess the point I'm trying to get to is that, for me, I don't mind what people call me, but it's how they treat me that matters. Because I know that my friends can call me 'crip' and see me as an equal; when someone else could call me a 'wheelchair user', and think of me as inferior, or in need of patronising and mollycoddling. That doesn't mean that I'm not careful of the language I use for other people, as I know how much the 'wrong' words can hurt.
OK, I guess that's enough of my theoretical and academic wonderings, sorry it was rather an essay!
And back to the original point!
Yes, the use of the r-word to describe things that aren't working properly can be very offensive. I think the things other people here have come up with are the best course of action. Explain that it used to be (and in some places or for some people, still is) a medical term, and that to use it as a derogatory term, is to insult all those for whom the 'medical term' would apply. It is the same as using the term 'gay' as an insult; it is implying that some people are inferior, just because of their sexuality.
We all know that using those words is wrong, but the disabled community always seems to be an easy target - maybe because some (like me) are a little slower moving
: And I meant that only as humor about myself, and a lighthearted ending, not in any way to offend or be derrogatory,
; it's just that I feel the need to laugh about my situation where possible.
Humour is sometimes the best way to deal with the rougher bits of life.
I completely understand (as I'm sure everyone here does) that sometimes you need to laugh at yourself and your situation, to make it easier to deal with. Also, if we are able to laugh at ourselves, we'll always have a joke, whatever situation we're in