So for the east coast part of our trip, I've realised that we'll realistically only have time for New York and one other destination. I've been tossing around a few and it's soooooo hard to decide! DH is no help. We can get to all of these destinations on the train, so getting there isn't really a factor. We think we'll have 3 nights to spare.
Here's a short rundown of what I've come up with so far.
Option 1 - Boston
DH has expressed an interest in Boston, and it looks like a nice city to spend some time in. He's also keen on checking out Rhode Island on the way through. This would kind of be me sacrificing what I really want for DH to be able to go, although if we had enough time to see some countryside as well, I'd be quite happy to spend a few days in Boston.
Option 2 - Washington DC
I think DH would love it there with all the history, and it has been on my list for a while too. While I wouldn't get to see any countryside as such, there do seem to be a lot of nice parks and gardens. However, while it does interest me somewhat, the thought of spending what little time we have there doesn't fill me with enthusiasm.
Option 3 - Niagara Falls (Canada side)
This would technically get us to another country too
I like the idea of seeing Niagara Falls, and I'm sure there is plenty to do there for 2 days. However, with such a limited time frame, I'd rather get a wider variety of sight-seeing.
Option 4 - Saratoga Springs
Bear with me. When I was a kid I used to read a series of books for tweens called Thoroughbred. It followed the adventures of Ashleigh, a girl who lived on a racehorse breeding and training farm in Kentucky. Her adventures took her to racecourses around the country, including Saratoga Springs. I remember in the book they made a big deal about it, and made it sound really pretty and historic. Also, there is a Saratoga Springs Resort at WDW, so it ties in with 2 of my favourite things
Aside from that, it looks like a pretty area with some nice trails, lots of history for DH, a car museum for C who may or may still be coming with us (to be honest, I'm kind of assuming they won't come), and horsies for me. However, I realise it's just to the edge of the real pretties. Which leads me to the next option.
Option 5 - Adirondacks (specifically around the Lake Placid area)
Looks like a natural wonderland up there, with many mountains to climb and lakes to see. Also, being further north, there may be more chance of pretty foliage. Plus there's the Olympic history at Lake Placid (I've learned throughout my travels that ski jumps are pretty cool things to see). My main problem here is that it's such a large place with so much gorgeous scenery, it hardly feels worth going for just a couple of days.
Now my next dilemma is this. Our flight to Newark is due to land at midnight. I've pretty much written that night off and we'll just stay as close to the airport as we can. However, do we then do NYC or our other destination first?
Pros for NYC first:
* We can have a more leisurely first morning without having to worry about missing trains etc
* I feel the other destination would be a more relaxing way to end the trip
Cons for NYC first:
* We will then be visiting our other destination over the weekend, along with everyone else (I imagine this would be especially problematic for Saratoga Springs and the Adirondacks, which seem to be more local getaways)
* Some of the return trains are brilliant timing for our next flight departing from Newark, but would be getting us into NYC too late to really do much
So, seasoned east coast visitors, I am looking for your input