Parks dress code?

[WEDcryoHEAD]

We should ban clothes and promote positive body image. One less thing to argue about.

Now that is something I can get behind

 

[dez1978]

Yeah, I don't love those either. I know people drink at Epcot and all, but it doesn't have to be so glorified - maybe that's not the right word. That said, if it doesn't contain profanity or anything graphic, then go ahead and wear them. I'll just silently judge as usual.

I think if we are honest we all do that, also human nature, and I think perfectly ok. It's ok to disagree with a thing without commenting on it.

“Inclusivity” doesn’t intentionally exclude anyone. It doesn’t mean…. everyone else changes to adapt to what a few want. It means everyone is welcome. If a place or situation doesn’t meet someone’s personal standards, it’s on them to remove themselves from that place. They don’t get to impose their standards/ beliefs on anyone else in the name of “inclusivity “.

I agree with this whole heartedly, but it doesn't really feel like that anymore.

 

[PezRuth]

Those who preach tolerance are the ones who are least tolerant of those who do not think the way that they do.

And this sentence right here tells me everything I need to know about this post. Goodness gracious.

 

[NannyBeBe]

I am an old lady and try to be in tune with today's styles. However, I do not think that visitors to DLR or WDW should be permitted to be in the park wearing only their underwear. My daughter saw a young woman dressed in a very tiny bra and very tiny panties. She reported it to a CM but was told they could do nothing about it.

 

[RoseGold]

This is like saying you are politically offended by hereditary monarchy, a position that has strong cultural basis in ths US. But Disney seems to endlessly glorify monarchy. So, for you to be "included" they have to remove the princesses completely for you, because you might see them.

It isn't "excluding" you for Disney to do something you don't like on their property.

It is "excluding" you to build a whole land of Pandora with no wheelchair attractions. And that's a big difference.

 

[WEDcryoHEAD]

And this sentence right here tells me everything I need to know about this post. Goodness gracious.

You agree or disagree? Just curious.

 

[PezRuth]

You agree or disagree? Just curious.

I am actually not going to engage in this anymore. I will be going to Disney in two weeks and it is going to be insanely hot when there do I suspect there will be all sorts of interesting outfits. And that is just fine by me. I will dress how I want to and they can dress how they want to. It is none of my business.

 

[WEDcryoHEAD]

This is like saying you are politically offended by hereditary monarchy, which Disney seems to endlessly glorify. So, for you to be "included" they have to remove the princesses completely for you, because you might see them.

It isn't "excluding" you for Disney to do something you don't like on their property.

It is "excluding" you to build a whole land of Pandora with no wheelchair attractions. And that's a big difference.

I do not understand your argument for hereditary monarchy. I love the princesses and would actually stop going to WDW if they were removed. Not sure where I argued for their removal.

To your other point. I am with you 100% every public place should be ADA compliant and therefor accessible to any and all who wish to enter. I am not sure how WDW has gotten away with Pandora not being totally ADA compliant.

 

[cheryl.UK]

True story. When Pleasure Island was still open, my husband and I were trying to get into one of the clubs and my husband had a FCUK T shirt on. The letters were sewn on with wool. The security guy told him he couldn't come in but if he turned it inside out, he'd be OK. He went into the restroom and did just that. When he came out we both burst out laughing, almost hysterically. Because the letters were sewn on with a contrasting wool and the shirt was now inside out, it looked even worse! We went back to the club and a female security guard also burst out laughing and waved us though quickly before the big guy spotted us.

 

[sheilafri]

All I know is that if you're going to put things on display, don't get mad or offended if I choose to take in the view.

You are in charge of you. Behave and keep your leering to yourself.

 

[Moliphino]

The point has been made. There is no such thing as inclusivity. Those who argue for inclusivity are arguing only the horse they have in the race. An argument for tolerance or inclusivity argues for intolerance and exclusivity of the opposing horse in the race. Just saying.

Inclusivity means everyone can wear what they feel is appropriate to the park (within Disney's rules). What is not inclusive is a prudish guest telling others guests what they can and can't wear. Inclusivity does not mean everyone has to conform to what the more conservative guests want. You've got everything backwards.

 

[FlightlessDuck]

I tend to not pay attention to what other people are wearing.

Chill Vibes Only!

 

[mjkacmom]

No nips, no guy or lady bits, all good.

 

[fla4fun]

No nips, no guy or lady bits, all good.

I haven't seen too much in the parks that I felt was insufficiently covered other than one young woman who was wearing low rise jeans that were so low that let’s just say I could tell at a glance that she waxed. She may not have realized just how low they were, or perhaps they had moved lower while she was walking. They may have been fine when she entered the park, and she may have been yanking them up all day as she made her way around WS. No way to know, and I didn’t see her again that day. However, other than that, I have seen plenty of bikini tops that covered the necessary bits and short shorts that covered their personal business, and never thought they should be covered up more. WDW in the summer is like walking on the surface of the sun.

If we are going after people with poor fashion sense, you’ll need to send the fashion police after me. Even as a female, I am much more concerned with comfort and practicality in the parks than winning a best dressed award, so if I wear socks with sandals it’s to prevent blisters (I cannot wear any footwear very long without socks or I get blisters like crazy). Not that I actually have sandals, unless you count my Crocs . . . (which I don’t wear in the parks).

I always figure it’s up to Disney to know their policies and to enforce them. Not my job.

 

[sheilafri]

The only thing I’ve seen in the parks that I (internally) objected to was about a 6 yo wearing a crop top and pants rolled down from the top exposing her hip bones. Probably someone dressed her that way, using very bad judgment imho, and I was so worried about her safety throughout the day.

 

[JaxDad]

No nips, no guy or lady bits, all good.

 

[C&Jx2]

What do one person's "religious beliefs" have to do with what someone else wears?

Nothing. It has to do with what THEY wear.

Oh No. Not at all. I am just saying WDW should more aggressively enforce the standard they already have. You can see the videos on tic tok of those who WDW has removed or given a shirt to or asked to cover up. That is more what I am referring to.

But skin isn't offensive. Swear words (arguably), sexual content, violent or racist content... That should be included. It's no one's business what strangers at a theme park think of their "risky" attire.

 

[TLSnell1981]

Thin nude leggings are the worst IMO

 

[nw6675]

All I know is that if you're going to put things on display, don't get mad or offended if I choose to take in the view.

No nips, no guy or lady bits, all good.

Maybe the real reason Splash Mountain closed was to keep people from walking up stairs. One of our trips had a girl with no underwear and a short skirt making sure everyone behind her on the stairs knew. It was very disgusting, but I think Kennywood might not have minded.

 

[princesscinderella]

My husband had an angry someone insulting his cargo shorts this weekend at WDW

That said OP don't go to the water parks or you will be horribly disappointed in the amount of clothes people are wearing.