So, I offer this question (and it is that, just a question) Could Disney eliminate some of the "cheaters" by requesting some documentation? Anything at all. A hand written note from a Dr. or therapist simply saying "this person would benefit from any consideration you can provide". No need to provide personal details. Or perhaps something a parent or adult might already have that shows a diagnosis (no need for an extra trip to the Dr.)
I agree it is a valid question; here's my take on it.
I have heard that some parks DO this, but I'm not so sure it would cut down on abuse.
I believe there have been some lawsuits (but I'm not sure about that). The reason is that the ADA says you can not be required to provide proof of disability in order to get accomidation. As long as the parks are providing accomidation (rather than special treatment like front of the line access), asking for proof would be not allowed.
Another thing to keep in mind is that a GAC is not a single card that gives everyone the same access (which is what some parks that do require 'proof' have). The GAC has a place for a stamp (or stamps) that tell what sort of accomidations are needed by the person it is issued to.
If the CMs are asking people "what needs do you have that you need accomidation for" or "what types of accomidation do you need", it is not as easy to 'cheat'. The ADA does allow that kind of quesion because (kind of obviously), the place needs to know what sort of assistance you need in order to provide it.
There are some websites that suggest bringing a letter with just the sort of wording you suggested, "this person would benefit from any consideration you can provide". One of the problems with that is it doesn't tell what sort of assistance the person needs (they still need to be able to explain their needs).
I did bring things like a copy of my child's IEP with us the first time we asked for a GAC; it was easy to bring (it was never looked at). But, it didn't give any clue of what my child's needs were - just that she has disabilities.
It would be very easy for many people who don't need accomidation to get a letter - people have written in the past that their doctor told them to get a GAC for
fill in the blank with any condition, and they posted here to ask about GACs. As it turned out, many of them really could not think of any
reasons they needed a GAC or how it might help them, but were going to ask for one because their doctor gave them a letter. They had a disability or condition, but did not have any need for accomidation to go along with it. Most of those people posting decided not to ask for a GAC because they could not see how it would help them.
And, what about those people who have needs, but didn't know they have to have a letter? Do they not get accomidation?
What about those whose doctor has never been to WDW and
thinks they don't need any accomidation?
Or what about those hard nosed doctors (and I have heard of some) who
would require a visit or a charge to write a note (which in some ways is fair, since they have to spend some of their time doing it)?
Or the people who find that WDW is a bit too much without accomidation after they are there?
If there is anything that people
think might 'get' them something, there will be people who 'cheat'. There were even counterfeit Make A Wish buttons being sold on International Drive for a while -what kind of parent would pretend their child has a life-threatening illness just to get a little 'special treatment'? This was something I had read about on a CM forum, so as far as I know, it was very real.
Two things I know that would help to cut down on 'abuse' would be for CMs to ask what sort of assistance is needed before issuing a GAC - I think most do that.
Another thing would be for the CMs to give an explanation of how to use the GAC the person is given, including things like using Fastpass (more than 'just take it to the CM at the attraction').